Paper detail

Central limit theorem for biased random walk on multi-type Galton-Watson trees

Let T be a rooted supercritical multi-type Galton-Watson (MGW) tree with types coming from a finite alphabet, conditioned to non-extinction. The lambda-biased random walk (X_t, t>=0) on T is the nearest-neighbor random walk which, when at a vertex v with d(v) offspring, moves closer to the root with probability lambda/[lambda+d(v)], and to each of the offspring with probability 1/[lambda+d(v)]. This walk is recurrent for lambda>=rho and transient for 0<lambda<rho, with rho the Perron-Frobenius eigenvalue for the (assumed) irreducible matrix of expected offspring numbers. Subject to finite moments of order p>4 for the offspring distributions, we prove the following quenched CLT for lambda-biased random walk at the critical value lambda=rho: for almost every T, the process |X_{floor(nt)}|/sqrt{n} converges in law as n tends to infinity to a reflected Brownian motion rescaled by an explicit constant. This result was proved under some stronger assumptions by Peres-Zeitouni (2008) for single-type Galton-Watson trees. Following their approach, our proof is based on a new explicit description of a reversing measure for the walk from the point of view of the particle (generalizing the measure constructed in the single-type setting by Peres-Zeitouni), and the construction of appropriate harmonic coordinates. In carrying out this program we prove moment and conductance estimates for MGW trees, which may be of independent interest. In addition, we extend our construction of the reversing measure to a biased random walk with random environment (RWRE) on MGW trees, again at a critical value of the bias. We compare this result against a transience-recurrence criterion for the RWRE generalizing a result of Faraud (2011) for Galton-Watson trees.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.