Paper detail

Central engine of GRB170817A: Neutron star versus Kerr black hole based on multimessenger calorimetry and event timing

The central engine of GRB170817A post-merger to GW170817 is probed by GW-calorimetry and event timing, applied to a post-merger descending chirp which can potentially break the degeneracy in spin-down of a neutron star or black hole remnant by the relatively large energy reservoir in the angular momentum, $E_J$, of the latter according to the Kerr metric. This analysis derives from model-agnostic spectrograms with equal sensitivity to ascending and descending chirps generated by time-symmetric butterfly matched filtering. The sensitivity was calibrated by response curves generated by software injection experiments. The statistical significance for candidate emission from the central engine of GRB170817A is expressed by probabilities of false alarm (PFA; type I errors) derived from an event-timing analysis. PDFs were derived for start-time $t_s$, identified via high-resolution image analyses of the available spectrograms. For merged (H1,L1)-spectrograms of the LIGO detectors, a PFA $p_1$ derives from causality in $t_s$ given GW170817-GRB17081A. A statistically independent confirmation is presented in individual H1 and L1 analyses, in a second PFA $p_2$ of consistency in their respective observations of $t_s$. A combined PFA derives from their product since mean and (respectively) difference in timing are statistically independent. Applied to GW170817-GRB170817A, PFAs of event timing in $t_s$ produce $p_1=8.3\times 10^{-4}$ and $p_2=4.9\times 10^{-5}$ of a post-merger output ${\cal E}_{GW}\simeq 3.5\%M_\odot c^2$ ($p_1p_2=4.1\times 10^{-8}$, equivalent $Z$-score 5.48). ${\cal E}_{GW}$ exceeds $E_J$ of the hyper-massive neutron star in the immediate aftermath of GW170817, yet it is consistent with $E_J$ rejuvenated in delayed gravitational collapse to a Kerr black hole. Similar emission may be expected from energetic core-collapse supernovae producing black holes. (Abbr.)

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.