Paper detail

Center--limb variation of solar photospheric microturbulence

Microturbulence (ξ) is a key parameter introduced in stellar spectroscopy to explain the strength of saturated lines by formally incorporating an additional thermal broadening term in the line opacity profile. Although our Sun can serve as an important testing bench to check the usual assumption of constant ξ, the detailed behavior of how ξvaries from the disk center through the limb seems to have never been investigated so far. In order to fill this gap, local ξvalues on the solar disk were determined from the equivalent widths of 46 Fe I lines at 32 points from the center to the limb by requiring the consistency between the abundances derived from lines of various strengths. The run of ξwith θ(angle between line of sight and the surface normal) was found to be only gradual from ~1.0km/s (at sinθ= 0: disk center) to ~1.3km/s (at sinθ~ 0.7: two-thirds of radial distance); but thereafter increasing more steeply up to ~2km/s (at sinθ= 0.97: limb). This result further suggests that the microturbulence derived from the flux spectrum of the disk-integrated Sun is by ~20% larger than that of the disk-center value, which is almost consistent with the prediction from 3D hydrodynamical model atmospheres.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.