Paper detail

CEN34 -- High-Mass YSO in M17 or Background Post-AGB Star?

We investigate the proposed high-mass young stellar object (YSO) candidate CEN34, thought to be associated with the star forming region M17. Its optical to near-infrared (550-2500 nm) spectrum reveals several photospheric absorption features, such as Hα, Ca triplet and CO bandheads but lacks any emission lines. The spectral features in the range 8375-8770Å are used to constrain an effective temperature of 5250\pm250 (early-/mid-G) and a surface gravity of 2.0\pm0.3 (supergiant). The spectral energy distribution of CEN34 resembles the SED of a high-mass YSO or an evolved star. Moreover, the observed temperature and surface gravity are identical for high-mass YSOs and evolved stars. The radial velocity relative to LSR (V_LSR) of CEN34 as obtained from various photospheric lines is of the order of -60 km/s and thus distinct from the +25 km/s found for several OB stars in the cluster and for the associated molecular cloud. The SED modeling yields ~ 10^{-4} M_sun of circumstellar material which contributes only a tiny fraction to the total visual extinction (11 mag). In the case of a YSO, a dynamical ejection process is proposed to explain the V_LSR difference between CEN34 and M17. Additionally, to match the temperature and luminosity, we speculate that CEN34 had accumulated the bulk of its mass with accretion rate > 4x10^{-3} M_sun/yr in a very short time span (~ 10^3 yrs), and currently undergoes a phase of gravitational contraction without any further mass gain. However, all the aforementioned characteristics of CEN34 are compatible with an evolved star of 5-7 M_sun and an age of 50-100 Myrs, most likely a background post-AGB star with a distance between 2.0 kpc and 4.5 kpc. We consider the latter classification as the more likely interpretation. Further discrimination between the two possible scenarios should come from the more strict confinement of CEN34's distance.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.