Paper detail

Cell-cycle-synchronized, oscillatory expression of a negatively autoregulated gene in E. coli

Engineering genetic networks to be both predictable and robust is a key challenge in synthetic biology. Synthetic circuits must reliably function in dynamic, stochastic and heterogeneous environments, and simple circuits can be studied to refine complex gene-regulation models. Although robust behaviours such as genetic oscillators have been designed and implemented in prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms, a priori genetic engineering of even simple networks remains difficult, and many aspects of cell and molecular biology critical to engineering robust networks are still inadequately characterized. Particularly, periodic processes such as gene doubling and cell division are rarely considered in gene regulatory models, which may become more important as synthetic biologists utilize new tools for chromosome integration. We studied a chromosome-integrated, negative-feedback circuit based upon the bacteriophage λ transcriptional repressor Cro and observed strong, feedback-dependent oscillations in single-cell time traces. This finding was surprising due to a lack of cooperativity, long delays or fast protein degradation. We further show that oscillations are synchronized to the cell cycle by gene duplication, with phase shifts predictably correlating with estimated gene doubling times. Furthermore, we characterized the influence of negative feedback on the magnitude and dynamics of noise in gene expression. Our results show that cell-cycle effects must be accounted for in accurate, predictive models for even simple gene circuits. Cell-cycle-periodic expression of λ Cro also suggests an explanation for cell-size dependence in lysis probability and an evolutionary basis for site-specific λ integration.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.