Paper detail

CDM Abundance in non-Standard Cosmologies

The relic density of a cold dark matter (CDM) candidate is calculated in the context of three non-standard cosmological scenaria and its value is compared with the one obtained in the standard regime. In particular, we consider the decoupling of the CDM particle during: (i) A decaying-particle dominated phase or (ii) a kinetic-energy dominated phase or (iii) the decay of a massive particle under the complete or partial domination of kination. We use plausible values (from the viewpoint of supersymmetric models) for the mass and the thermal averaged cross section times the velocity of the cold relic and we investigate scenaria of equilibrium and non-equilibrium production. In the case (i) a low reheat temperature, in the range (1-20) GeV, significantly facilitates the achievement of an acceptable CDM abundance. On the other hand, the presence of kination in the case (ii) can lead to an enhancement of the CDM abundance up to three orders of magnitude. The latter enhancement can be avoided, in the case (iii). In a such situation, the temperature turns out to be frozen to a plateau value which is, mostly, lower than about 40 GeV.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.