Paper detail

CCD photometry of the first observed superoutburst of KP Cassiopeiae in 2008 October

We report CCD photometry and analysis of the first observed superoutburst of the SU UMa-type dwarf nova KP Cassiopeiae during 2008 October. We observed a distinct shortening of the superhump period at superhump cycle 15. Before that point Psh was 0.08556(3) d and afterwards it evolved from 0.08517(2) d to 0.08544(3) d with a rate of period change dPsh/dt = 3.2(2) * 10-5. We measured the likely orbital period as 0.0814(4) d placing KP Cas just below the period gap. The superhump period excess is 0.048(5) and, empirically, the mass ratio q is 0.20(2). The superoutburst lasted between 8 and 12 days, peaked close to magnitude 13 with an amplitude above quiescence of 5 magnitudes, and faded for 4 days at a rate of 0.14 mag/d. Close monitoring following the end of the superoutburst detected a single normal outburst 60 days later which reached magnitude 14.7 and lasted less than 3 days.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.