Paper detail

Cayley Configuration Spaces of 1-dof Tree-decomposable Linkages, Part II: Combinatorial Characterization of Complexity

We continue to study Cayley configuration spaces of 1-dof linkages in 2D begun in Part I of this paper, i.e. the set of attainable lengths for a non-edge. In Part II, we focus on the algebraic complexity of describing endpoints of the intervals in the set, i.e., the Cayley complexity. Specifically, We focus on Cayley configuration spaces of a natural class of 1-dof linkages, called 1-dof tree-decomposable linkages. The underlying graphs G satisfy the following: for some base non-edge f, G \cup f is quadratic-radically solvable (QRS), meaning that G \cup f is minimally rigid, and given lengths \bar{l} of all edges, the corresponding linkage (G \cup f, \bar{l}) can be simply realized by ruler and compass starting from f. It is clear that the Cayley complexity only depends on the graph G and possibly the non-edge f. Here we ask whether the Cayley complexity depends on the choice of a base non-edge f. We answer this question in the negative, thereby showing that low Cayley complexity is a property of the graph G (independent of the non-edge f). Then, we give a simple characterization of graphs with low Cayley complexity, leading to an efficient algorithmic characterization, i.e. an efficient algorithm for recognizing such graphs. Next, we show a surprising result that (graph) planarity is equivalent to low Cayley complexity for a natural subclass of 1-dof triangle-decomposable graphs. While this is a finite forbidden minor graph characterization of low Cayley complexity, we provide counterexamples showing impossibility of such finite forbidden minor characterizations when the above subclass is enlarged.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.