Paper detail

Cavity analysis on the robustness of random networks against targeted attacks: Influences of degree-degree correlations

We developed a scheme for evaluating the size of the largest connected subnetwork (giant component) in random networks and the percolation threshold when sites (nodes) and/or bonds (edges) are removed from the networks based on the cavity method of statistical mechanics of disordered systems. An advantage of our scheme is the capability of handling targeted attacks on sites/bonds in the presence of degree correlations beyond naive analyses on random failures (crashes) in networks of no degree correlations. We apply our scheme particularly to random networks of bimodal degree distribution (two-peak networks), which have been proposed in earlier studies as robust networks against random failures of site and/or targeted attacks on sites, and show that the correlations among degrees affect a network's robustness against targeted attacks on sites or bonds non-trivially depending on details of network configurations.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.