Paper detail

Causal Structure Identification from Corrupt Data-Streams

Complex networked systems can be modeled and represented as graphs, with nodes representing the agents and the links describing the dynamic coupling between them. The fundamental objective of network identification for dynamic systems is to identify causal influence pathways. However, dynamically related data-streams that originate from different sources are prone to corruption caused by asynchronous time stamps, packet drops, and noise. In this article, we show that identifying causal structure using corrupt measurements results in the inference of spurious links. A necessary and sufficient condition that delineates the effects of corruption on a set of nodes is obtained. Our theory applies to nonlinear systems, and systems with feedback loops. Our results are obtained by the analysis of conditional directed information in dynamic Bayesian networks. We provide consistency results for the conditional directed information estimator that we use by showing almost-sure convergence.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.