Causal Relationship: a new tool for the causal characterization of Lorentzian manifolds

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Abstract

We define and study a new kind of relation between two diffeomorphic Lorentzian manifolds called {\em causal relation}, which is any diffeomorphism characterized by mapping every causal vector of the first manifold onto a causal vector of the second. We perform a thorough study of the mathematical properties of causal relations and prove in particular that two given Lorentzian manifolds (say VV and WW) may be causally related only in one direction (say from VV to WW, but not from WW to VV). This leads us to the concept of causally equivalent (or {\em isocausal} in short) Lorentzian manifolds as those mutually causally related. This concept is more general and of a more basic nature than the conformal relationship, because we prove the remarkable result that a conformal relation $\f$ is characterized by the fact of being a causal relation of the {\em particular} kind in which both $\f$ and $\f^{-1}$ are causal relations. For isocausal Lorentzian manifolds there are one-to-one correspondences, which sometimes are non-trivial, between several classes of their respective future (and past) objects. A more important feature of isocausal Lorentzian manifolds is that they satisfy the same causality constraints. This indicates that the causal equivalence provides a possible characterization of the {\it basic causal structure}, in the sense of mutual causal compatibility, for Lorentzian manifolds. Thus, we introduce a partial order for the equivalence classes of isocausal Lorentzian manifolds providing a classification of spacetimes in terms of their causal properties, and a classification of all the causal structures that a given fixed manifold can have. A full abstract inside the paper.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.