Paper detail

Cauchy problem for a generalized cross-coupled Camassa-Holm system with waltzing peakons and higher-order nonlinearities

In this paper, we study the Cauchy problem for a generalized cross-coupled Camassa-Holm system with peakons and higher-order nonlinearities. By the transport equation theory and the classical Friedrichs regularization method, we obtain the local well-posedness of solutions for the system in nonhomogeneous Besov spaces $B^s_{p,r}\times B^s_{p,r}$ with $1\leq p,r \leq +\infty$ and $s>\max\{2+\frac{1}{p},\frac{5}{2}\}$. Moreover, we construct the local well-posedness in the critical Besov space $B^{5/2}_{2,1}\times B^{5/2}_{2,1}$ and the blow-up criteria. In the paper, we also consider the well-posedness problem in the sense of Hadamard, non-uniform dependence, and Hölder continuity of the data-to-solution map for the system on both the periodic and the non-periodic case. In light of a Galerkin-type approximation scheme, the system is shown well-posed in the Sobolev spaces $H^s\times H^s,s>5/2$ in the sense of Hadamard, that is, the data-to-solution map is continuous. However, the solution map is not uniformly continuous. Furthermore, we prove the Hölder continuity in the $H^r\times H^r$ topology when $0\leq r< s$ with Hölder exponent $α$ depending on both $s$ and $r$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.