Paper detail

Catastrophic fate of Schwarzschild black holes in a thermal bath

Using the Schwarzschild metric as a rudimentary toy model, we pedagogically revisit the curious prediction that the mass of a classical black hole in a constant temperature thermal bath diverges in a finite amount of time. We study in detail how this instability behaves if the temperature of the bath is allowed to vary with time and conclude that whatever the background behavior (but for a zero-measure subspace of the initial conditions), the black hole mass either diverges or vanishes in a finite time if the Hawking radiation is taken into account. The competition between both effects is subtle and not entirely governed by the hierarchy of the relevant temperatures. This instability is also shown to be reached before the background singularity in a contracting universe, which has implications for bouncing models. The results are generalized to spaces with extra dimensions and the main conclusions are shown to remain true. The limitations of the model are reviewed, both from the point of view of the dynamical black hole horizon and from the point of view of the background space expansion. Comparisons with other approaches are suggested and possible developments are underlined.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.