Paper detail

Catalogs of Hot White Dwarfs in the Milky Way from GALEX's Ultraviolet Sky Surveys. Constraining Stellar Evolution

We present comprehensive catalogs of hot star candidates in the Milky Way, selected from GALEX far-UV (FUV, 1344-1786 AA) and near-UV (NUV, 1771-2831 AA) imaging. The FUV and NUV photometry allows us to extract the hottest stellar objects, in particular hot white dwarfs (WD), which are elusive at other wavelengths because of their high temperatures and faint optical luminosities. We generated catalogs of UV sources from two GALEX's surveys: AIS (All-Sky Imaging Survey, depth ABmag~19.9/20.8 in FUV/NUV) and MIS (Medium-depth Imaging Survey, depth ~22.6/22.7mag). The two catalogs (from GALEX fifth data release) contain 65.3/12.6 million (AIS/MIS) unique UV sources with error(NUV)<0.5mag, over 21,435/1,579 square degrees. We also constructed subcatalogs of the UV sources with matched optical photometry from SDSS (7th data release): these contain 0.6/0.9million (AIS/MIS) sources with errors <0.3mag in both FUV and NUV, excluding sources with multiple optical counterparts, over an area of 7,325/1,103 square degrees. All catalogs are available online. We then selected 28,319(AIS)/9,028(MIS) matched sources with FUV-NUV<-0.13; this color cut corresponds to stellar Teff hotter than ~18,000 K. An additional color cut of NUV-r>0.1 isolates binaries with largely differing Teff's, and some intruding QSOs. Available spectroscopy for a subsample indicates that hot-star candidates with NUV-r<0.1 have negligible contamination by non-stellar objects. We discuss the distribution of sources in the catalogs, and the effects of error and color cuts on the samples. The density of hot-star candidates increases from high to low Galactic latitudes, but drops on the MW plane due to dust extinction. Our hot-star counts at all latitudes are better matched by Milky Way models computed with an initial-final mass relation that favours lower final masses. (ABRIDGED)

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.