Paper detail

Catalog of narrow $C~IV$ absorption lines in BOSS (I): for quasars with $z_{em} \leq 2.4$

We have assembled absorption systems by visually identifying $C~IVλ\lambda1548,1551$ absorption doublets in the quasar spectra of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) one by one. This paper is the first of the series work. In this paper, we concern quasars with relatively low redshifts and high signal-to-noise ratios for their spectra, and hence we limit our analysis on quasars with $z_{em}\le2.4$ and on the doublets with $W_r\lambda1548\ge0.2$ Å. Out of the more than 87,000 quasars in the Data Release 9, we limit our search to 10,121 quasars that have the appropriate redshifts and spectra with high enough signal-to-noise ratios to identify narrow C IV absorption lines. Among them, 5,442 quasars are detected to have at least one $C~IVλ\lambda1548,1551$ absorption doublet. We obtain a catalog containing 8,368 $C~IVλ\lambda1548,1551$ absorption systems, whose redshifts are within $z_{abs}=1.4544$ - $2.2805$. In this catalog, about $33.7\%$ absorbers have $0.2$ Å$\le W_r\lambda1548<0.5$ Å, about $45.9\%$ absorbers have $0.5$ Å$\le W_r\lambda1548<1.0$ Å, about $19.2\%$ absorbers have $1.0$ Å$\le W_r\lambda1548<2.0$ Å, and about $1.2\%$ absorbers have $W_r\lambda1548\ge2.0$ Å.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.