Paper detail

Casimir scaling in glueballs in SU($N$) and Sp($2N$) gauge theories: hints from constituent approaches

We show that the lattice glueball masses $M_G$ versus $N$ in SU($N$) and Sp($2N$) Yang-Mills theories scale as $\frac{M_G}{\sqrtσ}\sim \sqrt{\frac{C_2(adj)}{C_2(f)}}$, with $σ$ the fundamental string tension and $C_2(adj)$ and $C_2(f)$ the quadratic Casimir of the gauge algebra in the adjoint and fundamental representations. This scaling behaviour is followed by the great majority of available lattice glueball states, and may set constraints on $SU(3)$ models by imposing a specific behaviour at $N\neq 3$. The observed scaling is compatible with two assumptions: (1) The glueball masses are proportional to the square root of the adjoint string tension, $M_G\sim \sqrtσ_{adj}$; (2) The string tension follows the Casimir scaling, i.e. $σ_{adj}=\frac{C_2(adj)}{C_2(f)}σ$. In a constituent gluon picture, our results suggest a low-lying glueball spectrum made of two transverse constituent gluons bound by an adjoint string, completed by three transverse constituent gluons bound by a Y-junction of adjoint strings rather than a $Δ-$shaped junction of fundamental strings.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.