Paper detail

Casimir energy for a Regular Polygon with Dirichlet Boundaries

We study the Casimir energy of a scalar field for a regular polygon with N sides. The scalar field obeys Dirichlet boundary conditions at the perimeter of the polygon. The polygon eigenvalues $λ_N$ are expressed in terms of the Dirichlet circle eigenvalues $λ_C$ as an expansion in $\frac{1}{N}$ of the form, $λ_N = λ_C (1 + \frac{4ζ(2)}{N^2} + \frac{4ζ(3)}{N^3} + \frac{28ζ(4)}{N^4}+...)$. A comparison follows between the Casimir energy on the polygon with N=4 found with our method and the Casimir energy of the scalar field on a square. We generalize the result to spaces of the form $R^d\times P_N$, with $P_N$ a N-polygon. By the same token, we find the electric field energy for a "cylinder" of infinite length with polygonal section. With the method we use and in view of the results, it stands to reason to assume that the Casimir energy of $D$-balls has the same sign with the Casimir energy of regular shapes homeomorphic to the $D$-ball. We sum up and discuss our results at the end of the article.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.