Paper detail

Cascaded Models for Better Fine-Grained Named Entity Recognition

Named Entity Recognition (NER) is an essential precursor task for many natural language applications, such as relation extraction or event extraction. Much of the NER research has been done on datasets with few classes of entity types (e.g. PER, LOC, ORG, MISC), but many real world applications (disaster relief, complex event extraction, law enforcement) can benefit from a larger NER typeset. More recently, datasets were created that have hundreds to thousands of types of entities, sparking new lines of research (Sekine, 2008;Ling and Weld, 2012; Gillick et al., 2014; Choiet al., 2018). In this paper we present a cascaded approach to labeling fine-grained NER, applying to a newly released fine-grained NER dataset that was used in the TAC KBP 2019 evaluation (Ji et al., 2019), inspired by the fact that training data is available for some of the coarse labels. Using a combination of transformer networks, we show that performance can be improved by about 20 F1 absolute, as compared with the straightforward model built on the full fine-grained types, and show that, surprisingly, using course-labeled data in three languages leads to an improvement in the English data.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.