Paper detail

Carbon-rich Giant Planets: Atmospheric Chemistry, Thermal Inversions, Spectra, and Formation conditions

The recent inference of a carbon-rich atmosphere, with C/O >= 1, in the hot Jupiter WASP-12b motivates the exotic new class of carbon-rich planets (CRPs). We report a detailed study of the atmospheric chemistry and spectroscopic signatures of carbon-rich giant planets (CRGs) and the compositions of icy planetesimals required for their formation, and the apportionment of ices, rock, and volatiles in their envelopes. For C/O >= 1, most of the atmospheric oxygen is occupied by CO for T > 1400 K and pressure (P) < 1 bar, causing a substantial depletion in H2O, and an overabundance of CH4 compared to those obtained by assuming solar abundances (C/O = 0.54) in chemical equilibrium. These differences in chemistry cause distinctly observable signatures in spectra. We also find that a C/O >= 1 strongly depletes the abundances of TiO and VO available to form thermal inversions, which is adequate to rule out thermal inversions due to TiO/VO even in the most highly irradiated hot Jupiters, such as WASP-12b. Adopting stellar abundances (C/O = 0.44) for the primordial disk composition and low-temperature formation conditions (T <= 30 K) for WASP-12b leads to a C/O ratio of 0.27 in accreted planetesimals, and, consequently, in the planet's envelope. In contrast, a C/O ratio of 1 in the envelope of WASP-12b requires a substantial depletion of oxygen in the disk, by a factor of ~0.41 for the same formation conditions. This scenario also satisfies the constraints on the C/H and O/H ratios reported for WASP-12b. If, alternatively, hotter conditions prevailed in a stellar composition disk such that only H2O is condensed, the remaining gas can potentially have a C/O ~ 1. However, a high C/O in WASP-12b caused predominantly by gas accretion would preclude super-stellar C/H ratios which also fit the data.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.