Paper detail

Carbon-enhanced metal-poor stars in dwarf galaxies

We investigate the frequency and origin of carbon-enhanced metal-poor (CEMP) stars in Local Group dwarf galaxies by means of a statistical, data-calibrated cosmological model for the hierarchical build-up of the Milky Way and its dwarf satellites. The model self-consistently explains the variation with dwarf galaxy luminosity of the observed: i) frequency and [Fe/H] range of CEMP stars; ii) metallicity distribution functions; iii) star formation histories. We show that if primordial faint supernovae dominated the early metal enrichment, then CEMP-no stars enriched by the first stellar generations should be present in all dwarf galaxies, with similar number of stars and CEMP fractions at [Fe/H]$< -4$. We demonstrate that the probability to observe a star that is carbon-enhanced within a given [Fe/H] range strongly depends on the luminosity of the dwarf galaxy and, on average, it is an order of magnitude lower in "classical" Sculptor-like dSph galaxies ($P\leq 0.02$) than in the least luminous ultra-faint dwarfs ($P \approx 0.1$). In addition, we explain why it may be easier to find CEMP-no stars at [Fe/H]$\approx -2$ in classical dSph galaxies than in ultra-faint dwarfs. These are consequences of the dramatic variation in the fraction of stars at [Fe/H]$<-3$ with galaxy luminosity: $\geq 40\%$ for galaxies with $L<10^5L_{\odot}$, and $\leq 0.2\%$ for $L>10^{7}L_{\odot}$. We present model predictions for the low Fe-tail and CEMP fraction of stars in dwarf galaxies, with particular emphasis on the Sculptor dSph, that can be used to shed light on the properties of the first stars.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.