Paper detail

Capturing Excitonic Effects in Lead Iodide Perovskites from Many-Body Perturbation Theory

Lead iodide perovskites have attracted considerable interest in the upcoming photovoltaic technologies and optoelectronic devices. Therefore, an accurate theoretical description of the electronic and optical properties especially to understand the excitonic effects in this class of materials is of scientific and practical interest. However, despite several theoretical research endeavours in past, the most accurate analysis of the key electronic parameters for solar cell performance, such as optical properties, effective mass, exciton binding energy (E$_B$) and the radiative exciton lifetime are still largely unknown. Here, we employ state-of-the-art first-principles based methodologies viz. hybrid functional(HSE06) combined with spin-orbit coupling (SOC), many-body perturbation theory (GW, BSE), model-BSE (mBSE), Wannier-Mott (WM) and Density Functional Perturbation Theory (DFPT). By taking a prototypical model system viz. APbI$_3$ (A = Formamidinium (FA), methylammonium (MA), and Cs), an exhaustive analysis is presented on the theoretical understanding of the optical, electronic and excitonic properties. We show that tuning of exact exchange parameter ($α$) in HSE06 calculations incorporating SOC, followed by single shot GW, and BSE play a pivotal role in obtaining a reliable predictions for the experimental bandgap. We demonstrate that mBSE approach improves the feature of optical spectra w.r.t experiments. Furthermore, WM approach and ionic contribution to dielectric screening (below 16 meV) ameliorate the E$_B$. Our results reveal that the direct-indirect band gap transition (Rashba splitting) may be a factor responsible for the reduced charge carrier recombination rate in MAPbI$_3$ and FAPbI$_3$. The role of cation ''A'' for procuring the long-lived exciton lifetime is well understood. This proposed methodology allows to design new materials with tailored excitonic properties.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.