Paper detail

Capture and escape from the 2:1 resonance between Ariel and Umbriel in a fast-migration scenario of the Uranian system

Recent measurements suggest that Uranus may exhibit a higher tidal dissipation than previously assumed. This enhanced dissipation leads to a faster orbital migration of its five major moons: Miranda, Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, and Oberon. Consequently, resonant encounters that have always been discarded in previous works need to be included. In particular, Ariel's fast migration implies that the crossing of the 2:1 mean motion resonance with Umbriel is extremely likely and it could have occurred in recent times. Capture into this strong resonance would have induced significant tidal heating within Ariel, possibly explaining its resurfacing. Therefore, in this work, we aim to explore the orbital history of the Uranian moons in a context of fast tidal migration, including the crossing of the 2:1 mean motion resonance between Ariel and Umbriel. For small initial eccentricities, we confirm that the moons are always captured into this resonance. As the system is not currently involved in any mean motion resonance, we investigated possible dynamical mechanisms for exiting the 2:1 resonance. We show that the resonance could have been broken by a further resonant encounter with Titania. We analyzed the crossing of the 4:2:1 and 3:2:1 resonant chains, and looked for the parameter space where the probability of escaping the resonance is maximized. Taking a dissipative parameter of Ariel $k_{2,2}/Q_2<10^{-3}$, the passage through the 3:2:1 resonance succeeds in disrupting the 2:1 Ariel-Umbriel mean motion resonance in more than $60\%$ of our numerical experiments. A fraction of our simulations results in final low eccentricities and inclinations, which can eventually match the current orbital features of the system. As the proposed orbital history requires specific ranges of the dissipative parameters for the system, future Uranus mission data will validate (or disprove) this scenario.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.