Abstract

Non-malleable codes, introduced by Dziembowski, Pietrzak and Wichs (ICS 2010), encode messages ss in a manner so that tampering the codeword causes the decoder to either output ss or a message that is independent of ss. While this is an impossible goal to achieve against unrestricted tampering functions, rather surprisingly non-malleable coding becomes possible against every fixed family FF of tampering functions that is not too large (for instance, when ∣F∣≤exp⁡(2αn)|F| \le \exp(2^{αn}) for some α∈[0,1)α\in [0, 1) where nn is the number of bits in a codeword). In this work, we study the "capacity of non-malleable coding", and establish optimal bounds on the achievable rate as a function of the family size, answering an open problem from Dziembowski et al. (ICS 2010). Specifically, 1. We prove that for every family FF with ∣F∣≤exp⁡(2αn)|F| \le \exp(2^{αn}), there exist non-malleable codes against FF with rate arbitrarily close to 1−α1-α (this is achieved w.h.p. by a randomized construction). 2. We show the existence of families of size exp⁡(nO(1)2αn)\exp(n^{O(1)} 2^{αn}) against which there is no non-malleable code of rate 1−α1-α (in fact this is the case w.h.p for a random family of this size). 3. We also show that 1−α1-α is the best achievable rate for the family of functions which are only allowed to tamper the first αnαn bits of the codeword, which is of special interest. As a corollary, this implies that the capacity of non-malleable coding in the split-state model (where the tampering function acts independently but arbitrarily on the two halves of the codeword) equals 1/2. We also give an efficient Monte Carlo construction of codes of rate close to 1 with polynomial time encoding and decoding that is non-malleable against any fixed c>0c > 0 and family FF of size exp⁡(nc)\exp(n^c), in particular tampering functions with, say, cubic size circuits.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.