Paper detail

Capacity and Spectral Efficiency of Interference Avoiding Cognitive Radio with Imperfect Detection

In this paper, we consider a model in which the unlicensed or the Secondary User (SU) equipped with a Cognitive Radio (CR) (together referred to as CR) interweaves its transmission with that of the licensed or the Primary User (PU). In this model, when the CR detects the PU to be (i) busy it does not transmit and; (ii) PU to be idle it transmits. Two situations based on CR's detection of PU are considered, where the CR detects PU (i) perfectly - referred to as the "ideal case" and; (ii) imperfectly - referred to as "non ideal case". For both the cases we bring out the rate region, sum capacity of PU and CR and spectral efficiency factor - the ratio of sum capacity of PU and CR to the capacity of PU without CR. We consider the Rayleigh fading channel to provide insight to our results. For the ideal case we study the effect of PU occupancy on spectral efficiency factor. For the non ideal case, in addition to the effect of occupancy, we study the effect of false alarm and missed detection on the rate region and spectral efficiency factor. We characterize the set of values of false alarm and missed detection probabilities for which the system benefits, in the form of admissible regions. We show that false alarm has a more profound effect on the spectral efficiency factor than missed detection. We also show that when PU occupancy is small, the effects of both false alarm and missed detection decrease. Finally, for the standard detection techniques viz. energy detection, matched filter and magnitude squared coherence, we show that that the matched filter performs best followed by magnitude squared coherence followed by energy detection with respect to spectral efficiency factor.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.