Paper detail

Canonical heights for Henon maps

We consider the arithmetic of Henon maps f(x, y)=(ay, x+f(y)) defined over number fields and function fields, usually with the restriction that a=1. We prove a result on the variation of Kawaguchi's canonical height in families of Henon maps, and derive from this a specialization theorem, showing that the set of parameters above which a given non-periodic point becomes periodic is a set of bounded height. Proving this involves showing that the only points of canonical height zero for a Henon map over a function field are those which are periodic (in the non-isotrivial case). In the case of quadratic Henon maps f(x, y)=(y, x+y^2+b), we obtain a stronger result, bounding the canonical height below by a quantity which grows linearly in the height of b, once the number of places of bad reduction is fixed. Finally, we propose a conjecture regarding rational periodic points for quadratic Henon maps defined over the rational numbers, namely that they can only have period 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, or 8. We check this conjecture for the first million values of the parameter b, ordered by height.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.