Paper detail

Canonical formulation of Pais-Ulhenbeck action and resolving the issue of branched Hamiltonian

Shortcomings of Dirac's constrained analysis in the context of fourth order Pais-Uhlenbeck oscillator action and the appearance of badly affected phase-space Hamiltonian for a generalized fourth order oscillator action, following Ostrogradski, Dirac and Horowitz's formalism, require a viable canonical formulation. This is achieved only after fixing appropriate variables at the end points and taking care of the counter surface terms obtained from variational principle. In the process a one-to-one correspondence between different higher order theories has been established. On the other hand the issue of branched Hamiltonian appearing in the presence of velocities with degree higher than two in the Lagrangian, has not been resolved uniquely as yet. However, often such terms appear with higher order theory, gravity in particular. Here we show that canonical formulation of higher order theory takes care of the issue elegantly.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.