Paper detail

Canonical dual theory applied to a Lennard-Jones potential minimization problem

The simplified Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential minimization problem is $f(x)=4\sum_{i=1}^N \sum_{j=1,j<i}^N (\frac{1}{τ_{ij}^6} -\frac{1}{τ_{ij}^3}) {subject to} x\in \mathbb{R}^n,$ where $τ_{ij}=(x_{3i-2}-x_{3j-2})^2 +(x_{3i-1}-x_{3j-1})^2 +(x_{3i} -x_{3j})^2$, $(x_{3i-2},x_{3i-1},x_{3i})$ is the coordinates of atom $i$ in $\mathbb{R}^3$, $i,j=1,2,...,N(\geq 2 \quad \text{integer})$, $n=3N$ and $N$ is the whole number of atoms. The nonconvexity of the objective function and the huge number of local minima, which is growing exponentially with $N$, interest many mathematical optimization experts. In this paper, the canonical dual theory elegantly tackles this problem illuminated by the amyloid fibril molecular model building. Keywords: Mathematical Canonical Duality Theory $\cdot$ Mathematical Optimization $\cdot$ Lennard-Jones Potential Minimization Problem $\cdot$ Global Optimization.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.