Paper detail

Candidate Primeval Galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field

We present the results of colour-selection of candidate high redshift (2.6 $<$ z $<$ 3.9) galaxies within the Hubble Deep Field based on the Ly-break at 912Å. We find 8 such objects in the region, giving a comoving number density comparable to that of nearby bright galaxies (for a flat q$_0$=0.5, H$_0$=100 kms$^{-1}$Mpc$^{-1}$ universe). We provide basic data on the properties of these objects, and show that despite their absolute magnitude being significantly brighter than L$^*$ (typically M$_B$ = -22), they are generally smaller than nearby galaxies. Furthermore, visual inspection of their images shows that they are all highly disturbed systems, with multiple nuclei, tails and plumes, suggesting that they are undergoing merging processes similar to most nearby starburst galaxies. Theoretical models suggest that galaxies form by accumulation of numerous subcomponents, and we suggest that we are seeing this process underway in these objects. It is thus possible that the epoch of galaxy formation might have been discovered.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.