Paper detail

Candidate fossil groups in the CFHTLS: a probabilistic approach

Fossil groups (FGs) have been discovered twenty-five years ago, and are now defined as galaxy groups with an X-ray luminosity higher than $10^{42}\ h_{50}^{-2}$ erg s$^{-1}$ and a brightest group galaxy brighter than the other group members by at least 2 magnitudes. However, the scenario of their formation remains controversial. We propose here a probabilistic analysis of FGs, extracted from the large catalogue of candidate groups and clusters detected by Sarron et al. (2018) in the CFHTLS survey, based on photometric redshifts, to investigate their position in the cosmic web and probe their environment. Based on spectroscopic and photometric redshifts, we estimate the probability of galaxies to belong to a galaxy structure, and by imposing the condition that the brightest group galaxy is at least brighter than the others by 2 magnitudes, we compute the probability for a given galaxy structure to be a FG. We analyse the mass distribution of these candidate FGs, and estimate their distance to the filaments and nodes of the cosmic web in which they are embedded. We find that the structures with masses lower than $2.4\times 10^{14}$ M$_\odot$ have the highest probabilities of being fossil groups (PFG). Overall, structures with PFG$\geq$50% are located close to the cosmic web filaments (87% are located at less than 1 Mpc from their nearest filament). They are preferentially four times more distant from their nearest node than from their nearest filament. We confirm that FGs have small masses and are rare. They seem to reside closeby cosmic filaments and do not survive in nodes. Being in a poor environment could therefore be the driver of FG formation, the number of nearby galaxies not being sufficient to compensate for the cannibalism of the central group galaxy.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.

Candidate fossil groups in the CFHTLS: a probabilistic approach | BZPEER | BZPEER