Paper detail

Can we make biochemistry an exact science?

Biochemists know that the law of mass action is not exact and not very useful because we cannot transfer it (with unchanged parameters) from one condition to another. I argue that exact equations require calibrated multiscale analysis to deal with ions. Exact theories in biochemistry must use mathematics of interactions because biological ionic solutions, derived from seawater, are complex (not simple) fluids. The activity of one ion depends on every other ion. Mathematics of conservative interactions is well understood but friction is another matter. Mathematicians now have now an energetic variational calculus dealing with friction. Complex fluids need variational methods because everything interacts with everything else. Mathematics designed to handle interactions is needed to produce exact equations. If interactions are not addressed with variational mathematics, they are bewildering. The mathematics must include the global properties of the electric field. Flow of charge in one place changes the flow everywhere by Kirchoff and Maxwell laws. Charge changes physical nature as it flows through a circuit. It is ions in salt water; it is electrons in a vacuum tube; it is quasi-particles in a semiconductor; and it is nothing much in a vacuum capacitor (i.e., displacement current). Charge is abstract. The physical nature of charge and current is strikingly diverse; yet, the flow of current is exactly the same in every element in a series circuit. The global nature of electric flow prevents the law of mass action from being exact. The law of mass action (with rate constants that are constant) does not know about charge. The law of mass action is about mass conservation. I believe the law of mass action must be modified to be consistent with the Kirchoff current law if biochemistry is to be an exact science.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.