Paper detail

Can We Fly to Planet 9?

Planet 9 is an hypothetical object in the outer Solar system, which is as yet undiscovered. It has been speculated that it may be a terrestrial planet or gas/ice giant, or perhaps even a primordial black hole (or dark matter condensate). State-of-the-art models indicate that the semimajor axis of Planet 9 is $\sim 400$ AU. If the location of Planet 9 were to be confirmed and pinpointed in the future, this object constitutes an interesting target for a future space mission to characterize it further. In this paper, we describe various mission architectures for reaching Planet 9 based on a combination of chemical propulsion and flyby maneuvers, as well as more advanced options (with a $\sim 100$ kg spacecraft payload) such as nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) and laser sails. The ensuing mission duration for solid chemical propellant ranges from 45 years to 75 years, depending on the distance from the Sun for the Solar Oberth maneuver. NTP can achieve flight times of about 40 years with only a Jupiter Oberth maneuver whereas, in contrast, laser sails might engender timescales as little as 7 years. We conclude that Planet 9 is close to the transition point where chemical propulsion approaches its performance limits, and alternative advanced propulsion systems (e.g., NTP and laser sails) apparently become more attractive.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.