Paper detail

Can UVB variations reconcile simulated quasar absorption lines at high redshift?

In this work, we present new calculations of the observables associated with synthetic metal and HI absorption lines in the spectra of high redshift quasars, inspired by questions and limitations raised in work with a uniform Haardt-Madau 2012 ultraviolet background (UVB). We introduce variations at $z \sim$ 6 to the UVB and HI self--shielding and explore the sensitivity of the absorption features to modifications of the hardness of the UVB. We find that observed SiIV and low ionization states (e.g. CII, SiII, OI) are well represented by a soft UV ionizing field at $z =$ 6 but, this same prescription, fails to reproduce the statistical properties of the observed ion CIV absorber population. Therefore, we recommend a moderate reduction of the UVB at this redshift, an emissivity change between the UVB models that lies in between the Haardt-Madau 2012 emissivity J$_ν$ and one with a dex below J$_ν -$ 1 at 1 Ryd. On the other hand, variations in the HI self--shielding (SSh) prescription leave a non--negligible imprint in the calculated HI column density distribution function (CDDF) at $z =$ 4 and the comoving mass density of neutral Hydrogen (and the associated calculation with damped Lyman--$α$ absorber systems) at 4 $< z <$ 6. We conclude that small variations in the UVB and HI SSh at $z \sim$ 6 play an important role in improving the estimation of metal ions and HI statistics at this redshift.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.