Paper detail

Can Thorne-$\dot{\textrm{Z}}$ytkow Objects source GW190814-type events?

The LIGO-Virgo collaboration reported in their third run the coalescence event GW190814 involving a 2.6 $M_{\odot}$ object with a 23 $M_{\odot}$ black hole. In this letter we study the conditions under which Thorne-$\dot{\textrm{Z}}$ytkow objects (T$\dot{\textrm{Z}}$Os) can be connected to that type of events. We evaluate first the rate of appearance of T$\dot{\textrm{Z}}$Os in the local Universe. Under the assumption that T$\dot{\textrm{Z}}$Os eventually become low mass gap black holes we evaluate how those black holes end up in binaries with other stellar mass black holes and compare to the reported rate for GW190814-type of events (1-23 $\textrm{Gpc}^{-3} \textrm{yr}^{-1}$). We find that T$\dot{\textrm{Z}}$Os in dense stellar clusters can not explain the LIGO-Virgo rate without a T$\dot{\textrm{Z}}$Os population in the field providing a dominant contribution. We also find that T$\dot{\textrm{Z}}$Os formed within hierarchical triple systems in the field with the third more distant star being the progenitor of a stellar mass black hole, may be able to give a rate comparable to that of GW190814-type events. In that case, future observations should discover mergers between stellar mass and low mass gap black holes, with the lower mass spanning the entire low mass gap range.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.