Can the Renormalization Group Improved Effective Potential be used to estimate the Higgs Mass in the Conformal Limit of the Standard Model?

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Abstract

We consider the effective potential VV in the standard model with a single Higgs doublet in the limit that the only mass scale μμ present is radiatively generated. Using a technique that has been shown to determine VV completely in terms of the renormalization group (RG) functions when using the Coleman-Weinberg (CW) renormalization scheme, we first sum leading-log (LL) contributions to VV using the one loop RG functions, associated with five couplings (the top quark Yukawa coupling xx, the quartic coupling of the Higgs field yy, the SU(3) gauge coupling zz, and the SU(2)×U(1)SU(2) \times U(1) couplings rr and ss). We then employ the two loop RG functions with the three couplings xx, yy, zz to sum the next-to-leading-log (NLL) contributions to VV and then the three to five loop RG functions with one coupling yy to sum all the N2LL...N4LLN^2LL...N^4LL contributions to VV. In order to compute these sums, it is necessary to convert those RG functions that have been originally computed explicitly in the minimal subtraction (MS) scheme to their form in the CW scheme. The Higgs mass can then be determined from the effective potential: the LLLL result is mH=219  GeV/c2m_{H}=219\;GeV/c^2 decreases to mH=188  GeV/c2m_{H}=188\;GeV/c^2 at N2LLN^{2}LL order and mH=163  GeV/c2m_{H}=163\;GeV/c^2 at N4LLN^{4}LL order. No reasonable estimate of mHm_H can be made at orders VNLLV_{NLL} or VN3LLV_{N^3LL}. This is taken to be an indication that this mechanism for spontaneous symmetry breaking is in fact viable, though one in which there is slow convergence towards the actual value of mHm_H. The mass 163  GeV/c2163\;GeV/c^2 is argued to be an upper bound on mHm_H.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.