Paper detail

Can the excess in the FeXXVI Ly gamma line from the Galactic Center provide evidence for 17 keV sterile neutrinos?

The standard model of particle physics assumes that neutrinos are massless, although adding non-zeros is required by the experimentally established phenomenon of neutrino oscillations requires neutrinos to have non-zero mass. Sterile neutrinos (or right-handed neutrinos) are a good warm dark matter candidate. We find that the excess of the intensity in the 8.7 keV line (at the energy of the FeXXVI Ly$γ$ line) in the spectrum of the Galactic center observed by the Suzaku X-ray mission cannot be explained by standard ionization and recombination processes. We suggest that the origin of this excess is via decays of sterile neutrinos with a mass of 17.4 keV and estimate the value of the mixing angle. The estimated value of the mixing angle $\sin^2(2θ)=(4.1 \pm 2.2)\times10^{-12}$ lies in the allowed region of the mixing angle of dark matter sterile neutrino with a mass of 17-18 keV.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.