Paper detail

Can the CP asymmetries in $B\to ψK_S$ and $B\to ψK_L$ differ?

In the standard model the CP asymmetries in $B\to ψK_S$ and $B\to ψK_L$ are equal in magnitude and opposite in sign to very good approximation. We compute the order $ε_K$ corrections to each of these CP asymmetries and find that they give a deviation from $\sin 2β$ at the half percent level, which may eventually be measurable. However, the correction to $a_{CP}(B\to ψK_S)+a_{CP}(B\to ψK_L)$ due to $ε_K$ is further suppressed. The dominant corrections to this sum, at the few times $10^{-3}$ level, come from the $B$ lifetime difference, and CP violation in $B- \bar B$ mixing and $B \to ψK$ decay. New physics could induce a significant difference in the $\sin(Δm_B t)$ time dependence in the asymmetries if and only if the "wrong-flavor" amplitudes $B \to ψ\bar K$ or $\bar B \to ψK$ are generated. A scale of new physics that lies well below the weak scale would be required. Potential scenarios are therefore highly constrained, and do not appear feasible. A direct test is proposed to set bounds on such effects.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.