Paper detail

Can surface oxygen abundances of red giants be explained by the canonical mixing theory?

Extensive oxygen abundance determinations were carried out for 239 late-G/early-K giant stars of 1.5-5 M_sun by applying the spectrum-fitting technique to O I 7771-5 and [O I] 6300/6363 lines based on the high-dispersion spectra in the red region newly obtained at Okayama Astrophysical Observatory. Our main purpose was to clarify whether any significantly large (<~0.4-0.5 dex) O-deficit really exists in these evolved stars, which was once suspected by Takeda et al. (2008, PASJ, 60, 781) from the analysis of the [O I] 5577 line, since it (if real) is inexlainable by the current theory and may require the necessity of special non-canonical deep mixing in the envelope. We found, however, that the previous [O/H]_5577 results (differential abundances relative to the sun) were systematically underestimated compared to the more reliable [O/H]_7773 (from O I 7771-5 triplet lines) or [O/H]_6300 (from [O I] 6300 line) obtained in this study. Comparing the updated [O/Fe] ratios with the theoretically predicted surface abundance changes caused by mixing of nuclear-processed products dredged-up from the interior, we concluded that the oxygen deficiency in these red giants is insignificantly marginal (only by <~0.1 dex), which does not contradict the expectation from the recent theoretical simulation. This consequence of reasonable consistency between theory and observation also applies to the extent of peculiarity in [C/Fe] and [Na/Fe], which were also examined by reanalyzing the previous equivalent-width data of C I 5052/5380 and Na I 6160 lines.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.