Paper detail

Can Nonlinear Hydromagnetic Waves Support a Self-Gravitating Cloud?

Using self-consistent magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations, we explore the hypothesis that nonlinear MHD waves dominate the internal dynamics of galactic molecular clouds. We employ an isothermal equation of state and allow for self-gravity. We adopt ``slab-symmetry,'' which permits motions $\bf v_\perp$ and fields $\bf B_\perp$ perpendicular to the mean field, but permits gradients only parallel to the mean field. The Alfvén speed $v_A$ exceeds the sound speed $c_s$ by a factor $3-30$. We simulate the free decay of a spectrum of Alfvén waves, with and without self-gravity. We also perform simulations with and without self-gravity that include small-scale stochastic forcing. Our major results are as follows: (1) We confirm that fluctuating transverse fields inhibit the mean-field collapse of clouds when the energy in Alfvén- like disturbances remains comparable to the cloud's gravitational binding energy. (2) We characterize the turbulent energy spectrum and density structure in magnetically-dominated clouds. The spectra evolve to approximately $v_{\perp,\,k}^2\approx B_{\perp,\,k}^2/4πρ\propto k^{-s}$ with $s\sim 2$, i.e. approximately consistent with a ``linewidth-size'' relation $σ_v(R) \propto R^{1/2}$. The simulations show large density contrasts, with high density regions confined in part by the fluctuating magnetic fields. (3) We evaluate the input power required to offset dissipation through shocks, as a function of $c_s/v_A$, the velocity dispersion $σ_v$, and the scale $λ$ of the forcing. In equilibrium, the volume dissipation rate is $5.5(c_s/v_a)^{1/2} (λ/L)^{-1/2}\times ρσ_v^3/L$, for a cloud of linear size $L$ and density $ρ$. (4) Somewhat speculatively, we apply our results to a ``typical'' molecular cloud. The mechanical power input required

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.