Paper detail

Can Large Language Models Automate the Refinement of Cellular Network Specifications?

Cellular networks, e.g., 4G/5G, rely on complex technical specifications to ensure correct functionality; however, these specifications often contain flaws or ambiguities. In this paper, we investigate the application of Large Language Models for automated cellular network specification refinement. We identify Change Requests, which record specification revisions, as a key source of domain-specific data and formulate specification refinement as three complementary sub-tasks. We introduce CR-Eval, a benchmark of 200 security-related test cases, and evaluate 17 open-source and 14 proprietary models. The best-performing model, GPT-o3-mini, identifies weaknesses in over 127 test cases within five trials. We further study LLM specialization, showing that fine-tuning an 8B model can outperform advanced LLMs such as DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen3-235B. Evaluations on 30 real-world cellular attacks demonstrate the practical impact and remaining challenges. The codebase and benchmark are available at https://github.com/jianshuod/CR-Eval.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.