Paper detail

Can Large Extra Dimensions Solve the Proton Radius Puzzle?

The proton charge radius extracted from the recent muonic hydrogen spectroscopy [Antognini et al. 2013; Pohl et al. 2010] differs from the CODATA 2010 recommended value [Mohr et al. 2012] by more than 4% or $4.4 σ$. This discrepancy, dubbed as the "Proton Radius Puzzle", is a big challenge to the Standard Model of particle physics, and has triggered a number of works on the quantum electrodynamic calculations recently. The proton radius puzzle may indicate the presence of an extra correction which enlarges the 2S-2P energy gap in muonic hydrogen. Here we explore the possibility of large extra dimensions which could modify the Newtonian gravity at small scales and lower the 2S state energy while leaving the 2P state nearly unchanged. We find that such effect could be produced by four or more large extra dimensions which are allowed by the current constraints from low energy physics.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.