Paper detail

Can Cosmological Accretion be Observed in H-alpha at z~2?

In previous studies, it has been shown that the large line widths observed in high surface brightness H-alpha emitters at low and high redshifts are likely due to the mechanical energy injected by intense star formation. Here we discuss the possibility that the high surface brightnesses observed are not due to star formation, but due to cosmological gas accretion. We assume that all of the accretion energy is dissipated as shocks from the accreting gas. We show that in order to explain the high surface brightnesses both the mass accretion rate and energy would have to be much higher than expected from simulations or from equating the star formation with the accretion rate. We also investigate scaling relations between the surface brightness expected from accretion and for star formation through mechanical heating and photo-ionization, trying to identify a regime where such accretion may become evident in galaxies. Unfortunately, the surface brightness necessary to detect the gas in optical line emission is about an order of magnitude lower than what has currently been achieved with near-infrared observations of distant galaxies.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.