Paper detail

Can Artificial Noise Boost Further the Secrecy of Dual-hop RIS-aided Networks?

In this paper, we quantify the physical layer security of a dual-hop regenerative relaying-based wireless communication system assisted by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs). In particular, the setup consists of a source node communicating with a destination node via a regenerative relay. In this setup, a RIS is installed in each hop to increase the source-relay and relay-destination communications reliability, where the RISs' phase shifts are subject to quantization errors. The legitimate transmission is performed under the presence of a malicious eavesdropper attempting to compromise the legitimate transmissions by overhearing the broadcasted signal from the relay. To overcome this problem, we incorporate a jammer to increase the system's secrecy by disrupting the eavesdropper through a broadcasted jamming signal. Leveraging the well-adopted Gamma and Exponential distributions approximations, the system's secrecy level is quantified by deriving approximate and asymptotic expressions of the secrecy intercept probability (IP) metric in terms of the main network parameters. The results show that the secrecy is enhanced significantly by increasing the jamming power and/or the number of reflective elements (REs). In particular, an IP of approximately $10^{-4}$ can be reached with $40$ REs and $10$ dB of jamming power-to-noise ratio even when the legitimate links' average signal-to-noise ratios are $10$-dB less than the eavesdropper's one. We show that cooperative jamming is very helpful in strong eavesdropping scenarios with a fixed number of REs, and the number of quantization bits does not influence the secrecy when exceeding $3$ bits. All the analytical results are endorsed by Monte Carlo simulations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.