Paper detail

Can a conditioning on stellar mass explain the mutual information between morphology and environment?

Recent studies with SDSS have shown that a statistically significant non-zero mutual information between morphology and environment persists up to several tens of Mpc, which awaits an explanation. Galaxies in different environments acquire their stellar mass through accretion and merger and the stellar mass function of galaxies is known to depend on both environment and morphology. Naturally, stellar mass can be an important link between morphology and environment which may explain the non-zero mutual information between the two. Measuring the mutual information between morphology and environment by conditioning the stellar mass would allow us to test this possibility. We employ here a volume and stellar mass limited sample from the $16^{th}$ data release (DR16) of the SDSS and find a non-zero conditional mutual information throughout the entire length scales probed. We compare the results with three different semi-analytic models implemented on the Millennium simulation and find their predictions to be in fairly good agreement with SDSS on smaller length scales ( $\lesssim 30 h^{-1}$ Mpc ), with a clear discrepancy observed at larger length scales ( $\gtrsim 30 h^{-1}$ Mpc ) where the models predict significantly lower conditional mutual information than the SDSS. Our analysis therefore suggests that only environmental and morphology dependence of stellar mass are inadequate in explaining the observed mutual information between morphology and environment and that physical processes which alters morphology may not necessarily have an impact on the stellar mass of galaxies and vice versa.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.