Paper detail

Calorimeter-Based Triggers at the ATLAS Detector for Searches for Supersymmetry in Zero-Lepton Final States

This thesis consists of three closely related parts. An analysis of data recorded by the ATLAS detector in 2010 in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV with an integrated luminosity of 33.4/pb is performed, searching for supersymmetric final states containing jets and missing transverse energy and no electrons or muons (zero-lepton channel). No excess over the Standard Model background expectation is observed. Using the CLs and PLR methods, exclusion limits are set in two different supergravity models. These considerably extend the excluded parameter ranges from earlier experiments. The rates and efficiencies of triggers based on combined signatures with jets plus missing transverse energy in ATLAS are studied, which are the primary triggers for the search for Supersymmetry in the zero-lepton channel. For the measurement of the efficiencies in data collected in 2010 and 2011, the bootstrap method is applied. Different sample triggers based on jets and missing transverse energy are compared and their efficiencies are measured. A reweighting approach is used to correct for the bias from the propagation of the uncertainties in the bootstrap method. A universal model is developed to describe the contribution of fake missing transverse energy from resolution effects to the rates of missing transverse energy triggers as function of the level of in-time pile-up, i.e. the number of concurrent proton-proton interactions. The input parameters are tuned to the properties of the ATLAS trigger system, and the model predictions are compared to measurements of trigger rates in ATLAS. Good agreement is found for low thresholds for which the rates are dominated by resolution effects, whereas the rates for higher thresholds are underestimated due to additional sources of fake and real missing transverse energy, which are not incorporated in the model.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.