Paper detail

Calibration of the 6302/6301 Stokes V line ratio in terms of the 5250/5247 ratio

Four decades ago the Stokes V line ratio in the Fe I 5247.06 and 5250.22 Å lines was introduced as a powerful means of exploring the intrinsic field strengths at sub-pixel scales, which led to the discovery that most of the photospheric flux is in intermittent kG form. The "green" 5247-5250 line pair is unique because it allows the magnetic-field effects to be isolated from the thermodynamic effects. No other line pair with this property has since been identified. In recent years much of the magnetic-field diagnostics has been based on the "red" Fe I 6301.5 and 6302.5 Å line pair, since it was chosen in the design of the Hinode space observatory. Although thermodynamic effects severely contaminate the magnetic-field signatures for this line ratio, it is still possible to use it to extract information on intrinsic magnetic fields, but only after it has been "renormalized", since otherwise it produces fictitious, superstrong fields everywhere. In the present work we explore the joint behavior of these two line ratios to determine how the "contaminated" red line ratio can be translated into the corresponding green line ratio, which then allows for a direct interpretation in terms of intrinsic magnetic fields. Our observations are mainly based on recordings with the ZIMPOL-3 spectro-polarimeter at IRSOL in Locarno, Switzerland, complemented by data from the STOP telescope at the Sayan solar observatory (Irkutsk, Russia). The IRSOL observations are unique by allowing both the green and red line pairs to be recorded simultaneously on the same CCD sensor. We show how the line ratios depend on both the measured flux densities and on the heliocentric distance (the μ value on the solar disk), and finally derive the calibration function that enables the red line ratio to be translated to the green ratio for each μ value.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.