Paper detail

Calibration errors unleashed: effects on cosmological parameters and requirements for large-scale structure surveys

Imperfect photometric calibration of galaxy surveys due to either astrophysical or instrumental effects leads to biases in measuring galaxy clustering and in the resulting cosmological parameter measurements. More interestingly (and disturbingly), the spatially varying calibration also generically leads to violations of statistical isotropy of the galaxy clustering signal. Here we develop, for the first time, a formalism to propagate the effects of photometric calibration variations with arbitrary spatial dependence across the sky to the observed power spectra and to the cosmological parameter constraints. We develop an end-to-end pipeline to study the effects of calibration, and illustrate our results using specific examples including Galactic dust extinction and survey-dependent magnitude limits as a function of zenith angle of the telescope. We establish requirements on the control of calibration so that it doesn't significantly bias constraints on dark energy and primordial non-Gaussianity. Two principal findings are: 1) largest-angle photometric calibration variations (dipole, quadrupole and a few more modes, though not the monopole) are the most damaging, and 2) calibration will need to be understood at the 0.1%-1% level (i.e. rms variations mapped out to accuracy between 0.001 and 0.01 mag), though the precise requirement strongly depends on the faint-end slope of the luminosity function and the redshift distribution of galaxies in the survey.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.