Paper detail

Calibrated Tully-Fisher relations for improved estimates of disk rotation velocities

In this paper, we derive scaling relations between photometric observable quantities and disk galaxy rotation velocity V_rot, or Tully-Fisher relations (TFRs). Our methodology is dictated by our purpose of obtaining purely photometric, minimal-scatter estimators of V_rot applicable to large galaxy samples from imaging surveys. To achieve this goal, we have constructed a sample of 189 disk galaxies at redshifts z<0.1 with long-slit H-alpha spectroscopy from Pizagno et al. (2007) and new observations. By construction, this sample is a fair subsample of a large, well-defined parent disk sample of ~170 000 galaxies selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 (SDSS DR7). The optimal photometric estimator of V_rot we find is stellar mass M_* from Bell et al. (2003), based on the linear combination of a luminosity and a colour. Assuming a Kroupa IMF, we find: log [V_{80}/(km s^-1)] = (2.142 +/- 0.004)+(0.278 +/- 0.010)[log (M_*/M_sun)-10.10], where V_{80} is the rotation velocity measured at the radius R_{80} containing 80 per cent of the i-band galaxy light. This relation has an intrinsic Gaussian scatter of 0.036 +/- 0.005 dex and a measured scatter of 0.056 dex in log V_{80}. For a fixed IMF, we find that the dynamical-to-stellar mass ratios within R_{80}, (M_dyn/M_*)(R_{80}), decrease from approximately 10 to 3, as stellar mass increases from M_* ~ 10^9 to 10^{11} M_sun. At a fixed stellar mass, (M_dyn/M_*)(R_{80}) increases with disk size, so that it correlates more tightly with stellar surface density than with stellar mass or disk size alone. In future work, we will use these results to study disk galaxy formation and evolution, and perform a fair, statistical analysis of the dynamics and masses of a photometrically-selected sample of disk galaxies. [Abridged]

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.