Paper detail

Calculating the energy loss of leading jets

The energy loss mechanism of jets plays a central role in nuclear and high energy physics. We propose direct measurements of the energy loss of leading jets and perform a calculation at next-to-leading logarithmic (NLL$'$) accuracy in the vacuum. The formation of leading jets can be described by jet functions which constitute probability densities and thus allow for a perturbative calculation of the average the energy loss. We identify the following three criteria for a direct measurement of jet energy loss at the cross section level. $i)$ We measure a well defined object, the leading jet, where the formation process can be expressed in terms of a probability density. $ii)$ In addition, we need a measurement of a hard reference scale with respect to which jet energy loss is defined. $iii)$ At leading logarithmic accuracy, we require that the jet energy loss can be identified with parton energy loss. We discuss suitable observables and present numerical results including threshold corrections by making use of a parton shower Monte Carlo approach.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.