Paper detail

Calculating power by bootstrap, with an application to cluster-randomized trials

Background A key requirement for a useful power calculation is that the calculation mimic the data analysis that will be performed on the actual data, once it is observed. Close approximations may be difficult to achieve using analytic solutions, however, and thus Monte Carlo approaches, including both simulation and bootstrap resampling, are often attractive. One setting in which this is particularly true is cluster-randomized trial designs. However, Monte Carlo approaches are useful in many additional settings as well. Calculating power for cluster-randomized trials using analytic or simulation-based methods is frequently unsatisfactory due to the complexity of the data analysis methods to be employed and to the sparseness of data to inform the choice of important parameters in these methods. Methods We propose that among Monte Carlo methods, bootstrap approaches are most likely to generate data similar to the observed data. Means of implementation are described. Results We demonstrate bootstrap power calculation for a cluster-randomized trial with a survival outcome and a baseline observation period. Conclusions Bootstrap power calculation, a natural application of resampling methods, provides a relatively simple solution to power calculation that is likely to be the most accurate option. It has several important strengths. Notably, it is simple to achieve fidelity to the proposed data analysis method and there is no requirement for estimates from outside settings. We are not aware of bootstrap power calculation being previously proposed or explored for cluster-randomized trials. We demonstrate power calculations for a time-to-event outcome in a cluster randomized trial setting, for which we are unaware of an analytic alternative.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.