Paper detail

Calculating a confidence interval on the sum of binned leakage

Calculating the expected number of misclassified outcomes is a standard problem of particular interest for rare-event searches. The Clopper-Pearson method allows calculation of classical confidence intervals on the amount of misclassification if data are all drawn from the same binomial probability distribution. However, data is often better described by breaking it up into several bins, each represented by a different binomial distribution. We describe and provide an algorithm for calculating a classical confidence interval on the expected total number of misclassified events from several bins, based on calibration data with the same probability of misclassification on a bin-by-bin basis. Our method avoids a computationally intensive multidimensional search by introducing a Lagrange multiplier and performing standard root finding. This method has only quadratic time complexity as the number of bins, and produces confidence intervals that are only slightly conservative.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.